Federal Discrimination Law: Update Information for 26 September 2008
Update Information
26 September 2008
This table lists changes to FDL Online to assist regular users keep track of developments in the law.
Updated Section(s) of FDL Online |
Case Name |
Chapter 3: The Racial Discrimination Act |
|
3.1.1(b): The right to equality before the law in s 10 |
Bropho v State of Western Australia [2008] FCAFC 100 |
3.2.2(a)(iii): ‘Based on’ and intention to discriminate |
Bropho v State of Western Australia [2008] FCAFC 100 |
3.2.4(a): Human rights and fundamental freedoms defined |
Bropho v State of Western Australia [2008] FCAFC 100 |
3.3.1(b): Applying Gerhardy |
Bropho v State of Western Australia [2008] FCAFC 100 |
3.3.2: Reasonable justification |
Bropho v State of Western Australia [2008] FCAFC 100 |
Chapter 5: The Disability Discrimination Act |
|
5.2.2(b)(iii): Applying Purvis |
Razumic v Brite Industries [2008] FCA 985 |
5.2.3(c): Comparison with persons without the disability |
Queensland (Queensland Health) v Forest [2008] FCAFC 96 |
|
Penhall-Jones v NSW [2008] FMCA 832 |
5.2.3(d)(iv): Goods and services |
Queensland (Queensland Health) v Forest [2008] FCAFC 96 |
5.2.4(a): Interaction between ss 5-9 |
Queensland (Queensland Health) v Forest [2008] FCAFC 96 |
5.2.4(b)(ii): Guide and hearing dogs |
Queensland (Queensland Health) v Forest [2008] FCAFC 96 |
5.2.6: Harassment |
Penhall-Jones v NSW [2008] FMCA 832 |
5.3.1(c): ‘Benefits associated with employment’ and ‘any other detriment’ |
Penhall-Jones v NSW [2008] FMCA 832 |
5.3.3: Access to premises |
Queensland (Queensland Health) v Forest [2008] FCAFC 96 |
5.4.1: Vicarious liability |
Penhall-Jones v NSW [2008] FMCA 832 |
Chapter 6: Practice and Procedure |
|
6.3.3: Ex parte injunctions |
Harcourt v BHP Billiton Iron Ore Pty Ltd [2008] FMCA 860 |
6.4: Election of Jurisdiction |
Price v Department of Education & Training (NSW) [2008] FMCA 1018 |
6.7.1: 'Repeat Complaints' to HREOC |
Lawrance v Watson [2008] FMCA 984 |
6.12.2: Principles governing determination of whether there are ‘no reasonable prospects’ |
Price v Department of Education & Training (NSW) [2008] FMCA 1018 |
6.12.5: Frivolous or vexatious proceedings and abuse of process |
Pitt v OneSteel Reinforcing Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 923 |
|
Rana v Commonwealth [2008] FCA 907 |
|
Lawrance v Watson [2008] FMCA 984 |
6.14: Application for Suppression Order |
L v Commonwealth [2008] FMCA 658 |
|
Lawrance v Watson [2008] FMCA 984 |
6.18: Standard of Proof in Discrimination Matters |
Penhall-Jones v NSW [2008] FMCA 832 |
Chapter 8: Costs Awards |
|
8.1.2: Power to limit and set costs |
Corcoran v Virgin Blue Airlines [2008] FCA 864 |
8.3: Factors Considered |
Thompson v IGT (Australia) Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 994 |