Native Title Report 2008 - Appendix 7
Native Title Report 2008
Appendix 7: Overview of Australian water sector
legislation and policies[1]
Download in PDF
Download in Word
Jurisdiction
|
Organisation
Responsible |
Key responsibilities
|
Key policy documents and legislation
|
Summary of policy objectives
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Commonwealth
|
Department of Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts
|
National heritage
Water policy and resources (if negotiated with states)
|
National Water Initiative
Water Act 2007 commenced on 3 March 2008 (mainly for the
Murray-Darling Basin) Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act
1999 Living Murray
Snowy Initiatives
|
To implement national water reform focussing on water security, ecosystem
health, efficiency and conservation. Provides a basin plan for the Murray-Darling, water trading, establishes
Murray-Darling Basin Authority to optimise economic, social and environmental outcomes and to ensure sustainable use of water. To protect the environment, especially matters of national significance in
line with the World Heritage Convention and Ramsar wetlands. |
Queensland
|
Department of
Natural Resources and Water |
Responsible for water
planning and management |
Water Act 2000,
Qld Water Plan 2005-2010, Qld Smart State Strategy 2005-2015. Wild Rivers Act 2005
Cape York Peninsula Heritage Act 2007
|
A strategy for improving sustainable water management, ensuring a secure
future water supply for communities, farmers, industries and rivers Preserve natural values of rivers that are almost untouched
Provides for the identification of the significant natural
and cultural values of Cape York Peninsula and joint management of national parks |
New South Wales
|
Department of Water and Energy
Department of Environment and Climate Change
|
Water responsibility is shared between two departments
responsibility for water extraction in terms of planning and licensing
protection and management
|
Water Management Act 2000
Water Sharing Plans (statutory object prepared under Water Management
Act)[2] Murray–Darling Basin Act 1992
|
Provide for the sustainable and integrated management of the water sources
s 3 Protect water for the environment while also securing the rights of water
users Provide to carry out intergovernmental agreement
|
Victoria
|
Department of Sustainability and Environment
|
Water management
|
Water Act 1989
Green Paper: Securing our water
future[3] Our Water Our Future: The White
Paper[4] |
Sustainably manage water resources
|
South Australia
|
Department of Water Land and Biodiversity Conservation
Department for Environment and Heritage
|
Improve sustainability through the integration and management of all of the
State's natural resources Achieve improved health and productivity of our biodiversity, water, land
and marine resources. |
Natural Resource Management Act 2004
Water Resources Act 1997
Murray-Darling Basin Act 1993
River Murray Act 2003
|
Promote sustainable and integrated management of the State's natural
resources including water Provide to carry out intergovernmental agreement
Protection and enhancement of the River Murray and related areas and
eco-systems |
Summary of reported progress on implementing
Indigenous access provisions of the NWI by each Australian
jurisdiction[5]
Jurisdiction
|
Indigenous access to water resources
|
Inclusion of Indigenous representation
|
Water plans to incorporate Indigenous objectives
|
Take account of native title
|
Account for water allocated to ‘traditional cultural
purposes’ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Australian
Government |
No specific Indigenous provisions
Water Act 2007, s 29, Authority to consult holders and managers of
environmental water in implementing environmental watering plan - This could arguably apply to Indigenous peoples |
Australian Govt will continue to work through the Advancing Reconciliation
Working Group of the NRM Ministerial Council for water-related Indigenous issues. |
Most native title issues
relating to NWI will be the responsibility of the relevant state or territory govt dept. The Aust Govt will provide advice to other Aust. Govt depts on water planning processes & native title implications. Water Act 2007 s 13 The Native
Title Act 1993 not affected. |
||
Queensland
|
Include Indigenous representatives on water management advisory
structures. Achieved through representation and consultation in development of water
resource plans. |
Representatives involved in development of water resource plans (s 41 of
the Water Act 2000 requires a community reference panel (CRP) with representatives of, inter alia, cultural interests). May also have Indigenous Working Groups to complement a CRP.
Consultation through NRM bodies.
|
Traditional indigenous
uses generally provided for by ensuring there are sufficient environmental flows. Their purpose is to mimic natural flow patterns. Provides for maintenance of water levels in water holes of
identified significance. Special issues papers
prepared for Diamantina and Georgina WRPs. |
As native title rights to water have not been legally recognised, Qld has
not been able to make any specific legislative or Water Resource Plan provisions. However, water allocated to
protect ecosystem processes acts to protect traditional uses associated with water. |
Wild Rivers
The wild river declaration or water resource plan must provide for a reserve of water in the area to which the declaration or plan relates for the purpose of helping indigenous communities in the area achieve their economic and social aspirations. This only applies to a small area in Cape York. |
New South Wales
Water Management Act
|
Commitment to Aboriginal peoples benefits to the Aboriginal people in
relation to their spiritual, social, customary and economic use of land and water, (s 3(c)(iv))in the objects of the act. Each Water Sharing Plan (WSP) provides for access in the form of Aboriginal
cultural access licences. Fees for such licences have been waived. Certain WSPs provide for
commercial access licences (North Coast Rivers). Future WSPS will provide for these types of licence. An Aboriginal Water Trust is now established under the WMA as a strict
commercial program. Supports participation in the water economy. $5m is available for the first
2 years of operation. A performance evaluation in 2007 will determine continuity.
The Water Trust has not led to significant outcomes for Indigenous
people[6] |
Each WSP Management committee included 2 reps from the local Aboriginal
community (s 11-14). Their responsibility to convey information discussed at meeting to
community for comment. CMAs are establishing Aboriginal Reference Groups to be used for ongoing
consultations on future WSPs. |
Many plans have general
aspirational statements. To evaluate this component would require more direct research. From conversations this has not really happened.
|
Native Title recognised s 55
Native title rights provided for under the Basic Landholder Rights provisions of the WMA, allowing a native title holder to take and use water without a licence o4 approval in the exercise of native title rights[7]. Native title claimants are
notified of applications for consents under the WMA (e.g new grants of water). Applications for new/amended works will be assessed to avoid impacts on
Aboriginal heritage. |
Each of the WSP recognise that extractions as part of a native title right
may increase over the term of the WSP, if native title is granted in NSW. |
Victoria
|
Water Act 1989 currently
incorporates public processes into water allocation decisions |
2001 - Indigenous Partnership Strategy including NRM.
A framework (ILMF) is being developed. Regional Indigenous Facilitators
undertaking information sessions with environmental agency. By mid 2007 formal agreements will be established with groups involved in
NRM issues. |
Victorian River Health
Strategy (2002) highlights The importance of protecting rivers of high community value, inc. those with sites of sig. ‘for Indigenous culture’. Indigenous consultation must occur during the development of river health strategies (eg Glenelg Hopkins River). A key objective of bulk entitlements consultative processes is to ensure that water is provided to the rivers and floodplains in a way that ‘ensures continuation of indigenous spiritual and cultural practice (e.g. Yorta Yorta Cooperative Mgmt Agreement and Lake Condah Sustainable Development Strategy). |
Since 2000 all affected
Indigenous groups are invited to participate in bulk entitlement consultative processes. No native title has been
awarded in Victoria. One native title consent order was granted involving Wotjobaluk people around the Wimmera River. There is no provision relating to the allocation of water for traditional cultural purposes. |
In the event that water is legally allocated to native title holders for
traditional cultural purposes, it will be accounted for within the relevant water account. |
South Australia
Natural Resource Management Act 2004
|
Water allocation plans must take into account those water users who are
dependent on the water source [s76]. Could be applied to Indigenous peoples |
1 Member suitable to represent Indigenous interests - Natural Resources
Management Council [s 13 (2)9(e)]. Minister must give notice to Aboriginal people of Board appointment (s 25).
Initial discussions have commenced with Indigenous groups to ascertain
likely issues. Said to be an intrinsic part of the review of all WAPs. 2005 – established an Aboriginal Statewide Advisory Committee to
advise on Indigenous issues. |
Natural Resources
Management Act 2004 provides for consideration of traditional owner interests in any natural resource. This includes water allocation plans (s 7). |
ILUAs have been used
‘in relation to access to and for a range of purposes. It is likely a similar approach may be adopted for indigenous access to water resources especially given Aboriginal cultural practices which integrate management of land, water and cultural practices’. |
Undergoing review
|
WA
Undergoing reform process
|
Water allocation planning
processes provide for Indigenous access to water resources; specifically for nonconsumptive cultural uses. |
State NRM Council held a 2 day forum on facilitating Indigenous engagement.
Forum inc. the NWI. National NRM meeting agreed to improve reporting on Indigenous interests
and water management. Establishment of water resources management
Committee must include as far as practicable a person who has knowledge and experience relating to the water needs and practices of local communities, including Aboriginal communities (s 26GK, s 26GL) |
Indigenous ecological
knowledge is also sought to assist in making appropriate water allocations for the environment. Indigenous engagement is
especially sought in development plans eg. Gnangara Mound near Perth. |
DOW to liaise with Office of
Native Title regarding the current process for dealing with indigenous interests in water management plans. By Jan 07, obtain legal advice on Indigenous access and entitlements and the requirements under the NTA and Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972. Policy position papers
finalised. |
|
Tasmania
|
Review of Water Act only takes into account aboriginal heritage
|
||||
ACT
|
No available data
|
||||
Northern Territory
Undergoing reform process
|
NT water allocation planning processes provide access
for non-consumptive cultural beneficial uses and for access to the consumptive pool for agricultural, aquaculture, public water supply, industry or rural stock and domestic uses. |
Indigenous engagement is
especially sought in developing WAPs and as members of Water Advisory Committees. Water Act provides for water resources review panel where 8 people
appointed with experience in Aboriginal affairs one of considerations (s 24(3)). |
Indigenous ecological knowledge is sought in allocating water to
the Environment. |
Implications of rights under
the NTA have not been considered or legally tested. Legal opinion should be
sought to clarify this issue in the context of water allocation planning and management. |
Competent monitoring systems exist and all access to water in WCD is |
[1] Adapted from Jackson S,
Indigenous Interests and the National Water Initiative: Water Management, Reform
and Implementation, Background Paper and Literature Review, Report for the IWPG
(2007), p 42. At: http://www.nailsma.org.au/nailsma/publications/downloads/NAILSMA_NWI_Review_UPDATEDec07.pdf (viewed 17 December 2008).
[2] NSW Department of Natural
Resources, Water Sharing Plans, http://www.naturalresources.nsw.gov.au/water/sharing_plans.shtml (viewed 17 December 2008)
[3] Department of Sustainability
and Environment, Victoria, Our Water, Our Future, http://www.ourwater.vic.gov.au/programs/owof (viewed 17 December 2008)
[4] Department of Sustainability
and Environment, Victoria, Our Water, Our Future, http://www.ourwater.vic.gov.au/programs/owof (viewed 17 December 2008)
[5] Adapted from Jackson S, Indigenous Interests and the National Water Initiative: Water Management,
Reform and Implementation, Background Paper and Literature Review, Report
for the IWPG (2007), pp 104-109. At: http://www.nailsma.org.au/nailsma/publications/downloads/NAILSMA_NWI_Review_UPDATEDec07.pdf (viewed 17 December 2008).
[6] M Durette , Indigenous
Legal Rights to Freshwater: Australia in the International Context CAEPR
Working Paper No. 42/2008 (2008), p 27. At: http://www.anu.edu.au/caepr/Publications/WP/CAEPRWP42.pdf (viewed 17 December 2008).
[7] M Durette, Indigenous
Legal Rights to Freshwater: Australia in the International Context CAEPR
Working Paper No. 42/2008 (2008), p 20. At: http://www.anu.edu.au/caepr/Publications/WP/CAEPRWP42.pdf (viewed 17 December 2008).