National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention - Background Paper 3: Mental Health and Developmen
National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention
Background Papers Index
Background Paper 3: Mental
Health and Development
Fear
of being alone.
Fear
for personal safety.
Fear
for safety of the family.
Talks
repeatedly of the traumatic event(s).
Expresses
anger or revenge against people who caused the family to flee.
Finds
it difficult to trust or have confidence in people.
Nervous
or uneasy in new situations.
Approaches
a new situation or task as though he/ she will not succeed.
Is
sad for no apparent reason.
Worries
too much.
from Behaviours Associated with Victimisation in The Impact of Current
and Traumatic Stressors on the Psychological Well-Being of Refugee Communities. [1]
In this Background
Paper
- National
Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention
- Mental
health and development of child asylum seekers
- Development
of the child
- Developmental
harm
- Strengthening
the capacities of families
- Children's
responses to stress and trauma
- Mental
health studies in Australia
- The
right to health, education, rest and play
- Periodic
review of a child's well being
- Questions
for submissions
1. National
Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention
In November 2001,
the Human Rights Commissioner announced an Inquiry into the adequacy and
appropriateness of Australia's treatment of child asylum seekers and other
children who are, or have been, held in immigration detention. The terms
of reference for the Inquiry include consideration of the mental health
and development of child asylum seekers and the impact of detention on
their well-being and development. [2]
This Background Paper
provides an overview of international human rights standards on mental
health and child development that are relevant to the Inquiry. It is intended
as a reference and guide to individuals or organisations wishing to make
a submission to the Inquiry. It should be consulted where relevant, but
it is not necessary to refer to a Background Paper when making a submission.
For further information
about the Inquiry, general information on relevant international treaties
and standards and the material used in the Background Papers, see Background
Paper 1: Introduction. This and other Background Papers are available
on the Australian Human Rights Commission
web site at http://www.humanrights.gov.au/human_rights/children_detention/background.html.
The term "child
asylum seeker" is used throughout the Background Papers. While the
focus in these papers is on children who have been detained when seeking
asylum in Australia, it is not intended to exclude other children who
have been detained. The Inquiry relates to any child who is, or who has
been, in immigration detention. "Child" refers to any person
under the age of 18.
Treaties,
Rules and Guidelines
Treaties that have been ratified by Australia, such as the Convention
on the Rights of the Child, are binding on Australia in international
law. The implementation of treaty rights of people in Australia
are monitored by United Nations treaty bodies, such as the Committee
on the Rights of the Child or the Human Rights Committee.
The fact that Australia has ratified a treaty does not automatically
incorporate it into Australian domestic law. Only when treaty provisions
are incorporated into Australian law do they create enforceable
rights in Australia. However, courts should interpret a law to be
consistent with the provisions of a treaty that Australia has ratified.
Other
international documents and instruments such as United Nations Rules,
General Comments by treaty bodies, United Nations High Commissioner
for Refugees guidelines, United Nations General Assembly Declarations
and publications by United Nations agencies are not binding on Australia
as a matter of international law. They are, however, persuasive
in interpreting treaties and contain goals and aspirations reflecting
a consensus of world opinion.
2. Mental
health and development of child asylum seekers
The experiences of
child asylum seekers raise specific mental health and development issues.
The social conditions that give rise to a child's flight from her or his
home country may include experiences of war, persecution, death, sexual
assault, violence, fear, flight and displacement. Many child asylum seekers
will have witnessed harm to family members or directly suffered abuse
or violence prior to or during flight. A child may also experience the
fears and insecurities which attach to migrant flight, an uncertain future
and exposure to different cultures, languages and religions. In Australia,
a child arriving without a valid visa will be incarcerated in a detention
facility. [3] Such experiences may have a significant
impact on the child's mental health and prospects for healthy development.
The mental health needs of child asylum seekers will often be far greater
than those of children raised in Australia, due to the damaging physical
conditions, emotional trauma and nutritional deficiencies that they have
commonly experienced. [4]
Mental health and
child development issues have significant overlap and are discussed together
throughout this Background Paper. The Inquiry welcomes submissions on
either subject, or on related health and disability issues. See also Background
Paper 4: Health and Nutrition and Background
Paper 5: Prevention, Treatment and Accommodation of Disabilities.
The Convention
on the Rights of the Child
1.
States Parties recognize that every child has the inherent right to
life.
2.
States Parties shall ensure to the maximum extent possible the survival
and development of the child.
Article
6, Convention on the Rights of the Child.
States
Parties undertake to ensure the child such protection and care as is
necessary for his or her well-being
Article
3(2), Convention on the Rights of the Child.
1.
States Parties recognize the right of the child to the enjoyment of
the highest attainable standard of health and to facilities for the
treatment of illness and rehabilitation of health. States Parties shall
strive to ensure that no child is deprived of his or her right of access
to such health care services.
2.
States Parties shall pursue full implementation of this right and, in
particular, shall take appropriate measures (f) [t]o develop preventive
health care, guidance for parents and family planning education and
services.
Article
24, Convention on the Rights of the Child.
1.
The States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone
to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and
mental health.
2.
The steps to be taken by the States Parties to the present Covenant
to achieve the full realization of this right shall include those necessary
for:
(a)
The provision for the reduction of the stillbirth-rate and of infant
mortality and for the healthy development of the child
Article
12, International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. [5]
Under the Convention
on the Rights of the Child (the Convention), Australia must ensure that
every child in Australia, regardless of nationality or immigration status
and regardless of how the child arrived in Australia, survives and develops
to the maximum extent possible, [6] enjoys the highest
attainable standard of health and rehabilitation [7] and is allowed to recover from abuse or violence. [8]
In ensuring the mental
health of the child, States Parties to the Convention and to related international
instruments are required to "develop preventive health care"
in addition to providing education and guidance to parents. Preventive
health care means detecting and treating physical and mental illness in
the child. [9] This involves examination of the child
"by a physician immediately upon admission to a detention facility"
to record and identify "any physical or mental condition requiring
medical attention".[10] Medical care, where possible,
should be provided to detained children "through the appropriate
health facilities and services of the community in which the detention
facility is located". [11] Mental health services
in detention facilities should be adequate, including through the "appropriate
training of doctors and other medical personnel". [12] Children who are assessed as "suffering from mental illness should
be treated in a specialized institution under independent medical management". [13]
Australia's obligation
to ensure the healthy development of child asylum seekers includes preventing
harm to them during their time in Australia and promoting their physical
and psychological recovery if they are survivors of abuse or violence.
States Parties to the Convention have an ongoing obligation to ensure
the child's right to healthy development, even where the child's parents
are present.
How further harm
can be prevented and recovery maximised is a focus of the current Inquiry.
Submissions are welcomed on how the mental health and healthy development
of child asylum seekers can be ensured, including through early identification
and appropriate program and intervention planning.
Other relevant rights
The child's survival
and development must be considered in the context of her or his relationships,
especially the relationship with family and community. All actions concerning
child asylum seekers must respect the responsibilities, rights and duties
of parents and families to provide direction to a child in the exercise
of her or his rights (articles 5, 9 and 18 of the Convention). The Convention
recognises the family as "the fundamental group of society"
and recognises children's rights in the context of parental rights and
duties and children's rights to participate with their community. [14]
Australia is obliged
to help maintain the child asylum seeker's culture, language and religion
by virtue of article 30 of the Convention. Restoring a sense of cultural
normalcy to child asylum seekers can be vital to ensuring normal development
and is clearly in the best interests of the child. [15]
The United Nations
High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) stresses the importance of ensuring
that children who suffer "emotional distress or mental disorders
benefit from culturally appropriate mental health services and treatment". [16] In addition to her or his cultural needs, the past
experiences of the child and the child's family need to be understood
when considering the child's present mental health and developmental well
being.
All actions concerning
child asylum seekers must also be non-discriminatory (article 2), ensure
the best interests of the child (article 3) and enable the child to participate
in decision-making affecting her or him (article 12). [17]
3. Development
of the child
Children change and
develop constantly as they make the transition from total dependency at
birth to the interdependency of adulthood.[18] Even
for children growing up in a loving family situation with full protection
of the State, development is a delicate process. For child asylum seekers,
whose State may have failed to protect them from violence and abuse, healthy
development can be very precarious, depending on a number of variables
including the effects of any past abuse or violence and the extent to
which past trauma may be compounded by present or future uncertainty.
Children do not develop
in isolation, but in reaction to their environment and through nurturing
by their family and community.[19] For child asylum
seekers, their development does not pause while their family's refugee
status application is processed or while they remain in detention. Given
the various levels of uprooting, disruption and insecurity involved in
the refugee experience, the development of children can be severely arrested.
Healthy development
means providing the optimal conditions for the child to flourish in her
or his current situation and not merely preparing the child for adulthood.
Ensuring a positive environment for child development is in the child's
best interests, as required by the Convention.
4. Developmental
harm
Developmental harm
arises where the risk factors which threaten a child accumulate and overwhelm
the child's capacity to cope.[20] Factors impacting
on the healthy development of child asylum seekers are many, but can be
grouped as:
- their past conditions
and experiences, such as experiences of trauma;
- current stressors
(daily life);
- additional factors
which can act as a buffer to or accelerator of harm. [21]
Past traumatic
experiences
States Parties shall take all appropriate measures to promote physical
and psychological recovery and social reintegration of a child victim
of: any form of neglect, exploitation, or abuse; torture or any other
form of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment; or armed
conflicts. Such recovery and reintegration shall take place in an environment
which fosters the health, self respect and dignity of the child.
Article
39, Convention on the Rights of the Child.
States
Parties shall take all appropriate legislative, administrative, social
and educational measures to protect the child from all forms of physical
or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment,
maltreatment or exploitation, including sexual abuse, while in the care
of parent(s), legal guardian(s) or any other person who has the care
of the child.
Article
19(2), Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Under the Convention
Australia must protect children from violence, abuse and neglect. [22] Where a child has suffered such mistreatment, Australia is obliged to
promote the child's recovery. [23] States Parties to
the Convention are required to report to the UN Committee on the Rights
of the Child [24] on the measures they have adopted
to ensure the physical and psychological recovery and social reintegration
of the child victim of neglect, exploitation or abuse, in an environment
which fosters the health, self-respect and dignity of the child. [25]
While not all child
asylum seekers will have experienced abuse or violence, many of them will.
Even where the child may not have experienced abuse or violence directly,
if the child's primary carer (usually the mother) is depressed, stressed
or anxious, the child may exhibit similar symptoms of stress or trauma. [26]
Experiences of abuse
or violence can create developmental harm in children. Symptoms in children
who experienced abuse or violence can include poor sleep and nightmares,
bedwetting, behavioural problems, either introversion or aggression, depression,
problems with familial and other relationships, emotional numbness, learning
difficulties, eating disorders and psychosomatic health problems. [27] The Inquiry welcomes submissions on the incidence and significance of
these symptoms in child asylum seekers and what strategies are required
to promote a child's recovery from abuse and violence.
Current stressors
Child asylum seekers
who arrive in Australia without a visa are held in immigration detention
facilities. They will spend anything from a few weeks to a few years in
detention, depending on the length of time it takes to determine their
asylum claim. Detention ends when the child is either recognised as a
refugee and released on a temporary protection visa or is deported. After
release on a temporary protection visa, the child asylum seeker may require
access to a range of social support systems. [28]
Australia's responsibility
to child asylum seekers does not end once they enter a detention facility.
While detained, child asylum seekers are entitled to enjoy all the rights
outlined in the Convention. [29] On release or deportation,
Australia's obligations continue. This is because child asylum seekers
require medium and long-term solutions to their situation and their time
in Australia should be used positively to help, not hinder their development. [30] Those recognised as refugees and released into
the community require ongoing assistance. Those to be removed to other
countries will require ongoing protection, assistance and monitoring,
particularly unaccompanied children. [31]
The impact of detention on
children
Detention is an additional
stressor on child asylum seekers who are adjusting to life in a strange
country. As the length of detention increases, a child's development may
be affected. The UNHCR advises against the detention of children, stating
that "detention can be harmful". [32] Children
may become "either passive and submissive or aggressive and violent"
as a result. [33] The Inquiry welcomes submissions on
this point.
Conditions in detention
facilities may also contribute to a child's stress or trauma. For example,
children may be affected by security measures designed to control and
manage detainees. Where adult detainees engage in protests or attempts
at self-harm, the child may be affected. Where security measures, such
as tear gas, physical force and separation of adults from children or
security checks at night are employed, children may be adversely affected.
The Inquiry welcomes submissions on the impact on children of conditions
in detention facilities and specifically the impact of security measures.
The child may also
face threats from other detainees. This may range from verbal taunting
to sexual abuse. The Convention obliges Australia to protect children
from sexual exploitation and abuse. [34] Preventive
strategies should be taken in relation to girl asylum seekers who may
face sexual violence or assault in their home country, during flight or
in a country of asylum. Single women and girls should be housed separately
from unrelated adult men. [35] If detained, children
should be "separated from adults unless it is considered in the child's
best interest not to do so" (article 37(c), Convention). [36]
The Inquiry welcomes
submissions on the appropriateness of detention for the healthy development
and mental health of children, particularly where the child requires rehabilitation
and treatment.
The impact of detention on
parents
The impact of lengthy
detention on the mental health of the child's parents or carers, such
as depression, stress or anxiety, may also impact negatively on the child.
UNHCR points out that "the more trauma or stress the parents or care-taker
has been subjected to, the greater the danger that children risk neglect
or abuse". [37] Parental stress can arise for a
number of reasons, including past trauma, the slow processing or rejection
of asylum claims or future uncertainties. Children's faith in their parents
may be affected by their parents' seeming powerlessness in detention.
UNHCR cautions that care needs to be taken to ensure that parents are
able to nurture their child and that if the parent is too physically weak
or emotionally stressed, "then the child's greater developmental
need is for the parent to receive help". [38]
The Inquiry welcomes
submissions on how parents cope in detention in relation to the effect
parents' mental health has on their children.
Keeping the family together
Only where children
are in a situation such as abuse or neglect by their parents should separation
be contemplated and then only after due process and where it is in the
best interests of the child.[39] In addition, UNHCR
has stated that unless it is "necessary to prevent abuse or neglect,
a child should not be separated from her/his family and community for
treatment." [40] This principle reflects the provisions
of the Convention. [41] See also the discussion on detention
and the best interests of the child, and the right to family life in Background Paper 1: Introduction, and the discussion of detention
in Background Paper 8: Deprivation of Liberty
and Humane Detention.
Additional factors which can
promote or hinder the well being of children
Positive or negative
factors may intervene between the developmental threat to a child and
the child's reaction to the threat. For example, the attention and nurturing
of a child's carer would be a factor that would assist a child to deal
with daily stress, while a depressed primary carer unable to care for
her or his child would be a negative factor.
Ensuring the well
being of the child will involve enhancing the factors which promote the
well being of children and reducing the negative factors which will harm
the child. It also involves providing special assistance to children who
have already suffered serious developmental harm.
Promoting the child's well
being
According to the
UNHCR, the principles which underpin the promotion of positive factors
for children include restoring a sense of "normalcy" by helping
the family function as normally as possible, ensuring that good things
happen on a predictable basis for the child (such as eating, going to
school, playing) and by helping families secure a medium and long-term
solution to their situation. [42] The return of normal
living conditions and including children in information sharing and decisions
are also positive factors. [43]
These needs correspond
to the various rights of the child outlined in the Convention such as
the rights to health, development, education, leisure and play and family
life and to be involved in the decision making process concerning her
or him.
Child asylum seekers
must also be informed of the reasons for their current situation, such
as their detention. They must be told what decisions are being taken,
who is making them and be enabled to participate in decision making on
matters affecting them. [44]
Intervening to assist children
who have suffered harm
The Convention requires
States Parties to protect and rehabilitate children who have experienced
previous abuse and violence, and states that their recovery and reintegration
must "take place in an environment which fosters the health, self
respect and dignity of the child". [45] Any intervention
needs to be culturally appropriate to the child and support any positive
coping mechanisms of the child and her or his family. [46]
The Convention obliges
States Parties in the case of violence, injury or abuse, neglect or other
mistreatment of a child, to take "protective measures includ[ing]
effective procedures for the establishment of social programmes to provide
necessary support for the child and for those who have the care of the
child, as well as for other forms of prevention and for identification,
reporting, referral, investigation, treatment and follow-up of instances
of child maltreatment described heretofore, and, as appropriate, for judicial
involvement". [47]
The Inquiry welcomes
submissions on current programs and other actions taken to support the
well being of children in detention and on release, and on how these can
be improved.
5. Strengthening
the capacities of families
Convinced that the family, as the fundamental group of society and the
natural environment for the growth and well-being of all its members
and particularly children, should be afforded the necessary protection
and assistance so that it can fully assume its responsibilities within
the community
Recognizing
that the child, for the full and harmonious development of his or her
personality, should grow up in a family environment, in an atmosphere
of happiness, love and understanding
Preamble,
Convention on the Rights of the Child.
States
Parties shall respect the responsibilities, rights and duties of parents
or, where applicable, the members of the extended family or community
as provided for by local custom, legal guardians or other persons legally
responsible for the child, to provide, in a manner consistent with the
evolving capacities of the child, appropriate direction and guidance
in the exercise by the child of the rights recognized in the present
Convention.
Article
5, Convention on the Rights of the Child.
1.
States Parties shall use their best efforts to ensure recognition of
the principle that both parents have common responsibilities for the
upbringing and development of the child. Parents or, as the case may
be, legal guardians, have the primary responsibility for the upbringing
and development of the child. The best interests of the child will be
their basic concern.
2.
For the purpose of guaranteeing and promoting the rights set forth in
the present Convention, States Parties shall render appropriate assistance
to parents and legal guardians in the performance of their child-rearing
responsibilities and shall ensure the development of institutions, facilities
and services for the care of children
Article 18, Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Under the Convention,
all children are entitled to grow up in a positive family environment,
with parents or legal guardians of child asylum seekers having the primary
responsibilities for the upbringing of their children. Australia is obliged
to enable parents to bring up their children in a warm, nurturing family
environment which fosters the child's well being and supports their culture,
language, religion and sense of identity. Parents can be vital to their
children's well being, bolstering their ability to cope and make sense
of their current situation. Where the primary carer in particular is emotionally
stable and able to cope, the child's perceived internal controls can be
strengthened and the social context of the family will prove a positive
mediating factor in assisting the child's development. [48]
To promote the well
being of the child, Australia may be obliged to support the parents of
child asylum seekers, particularly in ways to cope with their situation
in detention, including any stress they may be experiencing.
In helping parents
and particularly the primary carer, it is important to gauge how families
are functioning now and to understand how they functioned prior to flight
to avoid wrong assumptions, such as the original healthy working of the
family unit where that may not have been the case. While children should
be able to participate in decisions that affect them (article 12), parental
involvement should be encouraged so they can provide direction and support
to their child. Parents' information needs, particularly about their legal
status and detention, the outside world and the safety of family members
in their home country, may need to be facilitated.
Unaccompanied children
Unaccompanied children
will lack the social support of their family, important in itself for
healthy development, but also an important buffer to help them cope with
traumatic experiences. [49] Given their vulnerable situation,
the UNHCR states that unaccompanied children should not be detained.[50] The Convention requires States Parties to provide special care and assistance
to unaccompanied child asylum seekers, including the tracing of their
family members, which is essential and must occur immediately and in such
a way as not to endanger the child or the family. [51] Unaccompanied children should have a guardian appointed as soon as possible
and suitable care arrangements put in place for them soon after arrival
in Australia. [52] They may also need a legal representative
to advocate for them. [53] See Background
Paper 7: Legal Status.
6. Children's
responses to stress and trauma
Psychological stress
refers to the situation where a person's capacity to control the demands
of his or her environment is tested or overwhelmed. [54] A complex mix of social and psychological processes produce stress in
children and adults, but recurring elements appear to be perceived loss
of control over events, a threat to self-esteem and a feeling of helplessness. [55] While stress in children cannot be totally avoided,
its incidence can be minimised and the child can learn ways of coping
with stress.
A child may experience
physical reactions to stress. [56] The child may also
develop behavioural reactions, including cognitive reactions and even
distortions. The way a child adapts to traumatic events through coping
mechanisms has implications for preventing and treating mental health
problems. Certain perceived dangers may lead the child to try to cope
with the danger by adapting in ways that themselves may have socio-pathological
implications. [57]
It is particularly
important to consider the situation of unaccompanied children in light
of several international studies that have found that child asylum seekers
surviving the refugee process alone show greater emotional distress and
have more trouble adjusting than children who remain with or are rapidly
reunited with their families. [58]
The Inquiry welcomes
submissions on the responses of children to stress and trauma in the detention
environment.
7. Mental
health studies in Australia
A number of studies
have been conducted on the mental health impacts of detention in Australia
on adult asylum seekers. The results of the studies are relatively consistent,
in spite of the wide range of sampling methodologies and assessment approaches
employed, and the diversity of cultural and regional backgrounds of the
asylum seekers involved. [59]
The studies have
presented a consistent picture of asylum seekers as "a highly traumatised
population at risk of persisting emotional disturbance".[60] In summarising the experiences of mental health, legal and welfare workers
in Australia, it has been claimed that "[a]sylum seekers both in
detention and living in the community show evidence of profound depression,
helplessness and hopelessness".[61] For asylum
seekers held in detention while their refugee claims are being processed,
the risk of "retraumatisation" is claimed to be particularly
high. [62]
A 1997 study found
that more than two-thirds of 40 asylum seekers attending a community assistance
centre in Sydney had experienced at least one traumatic event, such as
witnessing killings, being assaulted or suffering trauma and captivity. [63] Thirty-seven per cent fulfilled the relevant criteria
for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). [64] In a
recent study examining detainees at Villawood Immigration Detention Centre,
85 per cent of participants reported chronic depressive symptoms, and
65 per cent had pronounced suicidal ideation. [65] Another
study found that the effects of pre-migration trauma exposure, anxiety,
depression and PTSD symptoms among asylum seekers may be exacerbated or
prolonged by stressors in the post-migration environment. [66] A study of Tamil asylum seekers living in the community found that 'statistically
significant' predictors of depression levels included family separations,
fears of being sent home, delays in processing refugee claims, conflict
with immigration officials, difficulty in obtaining treatment for health
problems, loneliness, boredom and isolation. [67] Most
of these were also significant predictors of anxiety levels and PTSD symptoms.
Studies comparing asylum seekers in detention to those in the community
further suggested that detention may directly contribute to increased
severity of psychological distress. [68]
The Inquiry will
consider the extent to which these studies have implications for child
asylum seekers in detention and the extent to which additional research
may be required. Submissions addressing the relevance of these studies
for children and the need for any further research are particularly welcome.
8. The right
to health, education and play
Right to health
The right to the
"highest attainable standard of health and to facilities for the
treatment of illness and rehabilitation of health" is guaranteed
in the Convention.[69] Mental health and proper development
is central to a child's physical health and physical illness in child
asylum seekers may have mental health or developmental causes. The right
to the highest attainable standard of health is discussed in Background
Paper 4: Health and Nutrition.
Right to education
The right to education
is recognised in the Convention.[70] School can be a
place in which a child can engage in positive learning and curricular
activities and these bring the structure and predictability that mark
a return to normalcy.[71] Schools may also act as a
useful focal point for mental health assessment and referral, as mental
health services are more likely to be perceived as a normal part of the
child's life when linked with school. Neglect of proper schooling can
impact upon a child's developmental needs. Article 29(1) of the Convention
outlines the linkage between the child's education and development. [72] See also Background Paper 6: Education.
Right to rest and leisure,
to play and recreation
1.
States Parties recognize the right of the child to rest and leisure,
to engage in play and recreational activities appropriate to the age
of the child and to participate freely in cultural life and the arts.
2.
States Parties shall respect and promote the right of the child to participate
fully in cultural and artistic life and shall encourage the provision
of appropriate and equal opportunities for cultural, artistic, recreational
and leisure activity.
Article
31, Convention on the Rights of the Child.
The Convention rights
of the child to rest, leisure, play, recreational activities and to participate
in cultural and artistic life are vital for the healthy development of
the child. [73]
The right to rest
can be as important as the right to nutrition, shelter, health care and
education. An over-tired child is unable to function properly, is unable
to learn and is susceptible to falling ill. [74] Accordingly,
Australia is obliged to ensure that child asylum seekers in detention
have adequate time for quality sleep and relaxation. The applicable international
standard appears to be sleep and relaxation of twelve hours between the
hours of 8.30 pm and 6 am for those aged under fourteen or in fulltime
education. [75] The right to leisure extends beyond
having sufficient time to sleep at night, but includes having the time
and freedom to do as one pleases. Submissions are welcomed on the right
to rest in detention and, specifically on the impact of curfews, muster
and spot checking of detainees on the quality of children's rest.
The right to play
refers to unstructured activities free from adult direction, whereas recreation
refers to curricular activities undertaken for pleasure, often connected
to the school. Play and recreation [76] are not compulsory
for the child, but the choice is that of the child; the State party is
obliged to facilitate the child's right to play and recreation.
Recreation activities
can include sports, arts, science, films and games. Such activities, usually
part of school curricula, should be genuinely voluntary. Where recreation
equipment is shared between adults and children, children should have
equitable access to the equipment. For example, where a detention facility
possesses a volleyball net or pool table for recreational activities,
children must be allowed equitable enjoyment of such facilities along
with adults. Recreation facilities must always be provided in a culturally
sensitive manner to ensure girls have equal access. Recreational activities
are also discussed in Background Paper 6:
Education.
The right to play
is a more complex right. [77] Often seen by adults as
a luxury rather than as a necessary part of life, play forms a vital part
of a child's development, particularly in learning social and personal
skills such as negotiation, sharing and self-control.[78] Play and recreational activities are also important for the physical development
of the child and to avoid mental harm, as outlined above. For child asylum
seekers, play can help the child cope with what has happened to them,
including past experiences of trauma or violence. Play can relax the child,
relieve tensions, help assimilate experiences learnt and help the child
function within the family and the community. These are all vital components
of healthy development. [79]
The quality of play
and recreation experience is related to the environment in which it takes
place. Inadequate provision of appropriate play space for children may
have mental health implications for child asylum seekers. [80] Basic play needs are simple: safe, accessible space for the child's use,
preferably with possibilities for creating or changing things. Design
should focus on safety and accessibility, but also consider shelter from
the sun and precautions such as safe heights and surfaces and adult supervision.
The design of play areas should conform to minimum existing standards
in Australia (article 2). The Inquiry welcomes submissions on appropriate
play facilities and applicable State and Territory standards on the design
of play and recreation areas as they may apply to detention facility design.
The right to cultural
and artistic activities includes the right to join with family and community
in adult cultural and artistic pursuits as well as child-centred culture
and arts. Children in a refugee situation may require special measures
to ensure their rights under article 31, on account of their vulnerability. [81]
In all these activities,
the child's right to participate under article 12 should be upheld.
9. Periodic
review of a child's well-being
States
Parties recognize the right of a child who has been placed by the competent
authorities for the purposes of care, protection or treatment of his
or her physical or mental health, to a periodic review of the treatment
provided to the child and all other circumstances relevant to his or
her placement.
Article
25 Convention on the Rights of the Child
Article 25 of the
Convention requires Australia to ensure that a child who is detained "for
the purposes of care, protection or treatment of his or her physical or
mental health", has the right to a periodic review of her or his
treatment and needs.[82] This right, which is relevant
to child asylum seekers being detained or institutionalised for health
or mental health purposes, is separate from Australia's obligation to
review the standards of treatment in its own institutions under article
3(3) of the Convention and the right to challenge detention under article
37(d). [83] Periodic review under article 25 should
consider both the appropriateness of the child's placement for the purpose
of the child's health or mental health and the progress of the child's
care. State authorities often sincerely believe that the "best interests
of the child" are being served by treatment which can amount to neglect,
mistreatment and even abuse.[84] Article 25 gives children
the right to have their treatment reviewed regularly.
The current Inquiry
will consider the extent to which Australia's care arrangements meet the
obligations under the Convention, including children's right to be heard,
to be in contact with the outside world and to have access to effective
complaints procedures.
The Convention requires
conformity with national standards on child care [85] and this is discussed further in Background
Paper 8: Deprivation of Liberty and Humane Detention.
10. Questions
for submissions
The following questions
may assist organisations and individuals in making submissions to the
Inquiry.
- How does Australia
support the mental health and development needs of child asylum seekers
in detention? Is there initial and ongoing assessment and treatment
of these needs from the time of the child's arrival in Australia?
- What in your
experience is the impact of detention on the well-being and healthy
development of children, including their long-term development? Can
you support this view with evidence?
- Can child asylum
seekers who are experiencing mental health or developmental difficulties
be properly treated in detention facilities? How? Is this in the "best
interests" of the child?
- To what extent
are the international standards in articles 19 and 39 of the Convention
met in Australia today?
- What are the
relevant legislative, administrative and other measures in place to
ensure child asylum seekers receive the protection and care they need?
Where are the gaps?
- What are the
arrangements between State and Territory child welfare agencies and
the Department of Immigration, Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
(DIMIA)? How does the care of children work in practice? Can you give
examples?
- Do detained
children suffer discrimination in comparison with other children in
Australia when it comes to their mental health and development? Can
you support any views with evidence? How are children on temporary protection
visas treated? How are other children treated?
- To what extent
are the mental health studies concerning adults relevant to children?
What additional research is needed?
- What processes
exist to ensure there is sufficient overview so that a child's treatment
in detention is properly supervised and monitored? Who should conduct
the monitoring of the child's mental health needs?
- What are the
daily programs in place in detention facilities for children? Are they
culturally sensitive and ensure equality of access for boys and girls?
ENDNOTES:
M McCallin (1993), The Psychological Well Being of Refugee Children:
Research, Practice and Policy Issues, International Catholic Child
Bureau, Geneva, p84.
The full terms of reference are available at http://www.humanrights.gov.au/human_rights/children_detention/terms.html.
See discussion of Australia's mandatory detention policy in Background
Paper 7: Deprivation of Liberty and Humane Detention.
See Background Paper 4: Health and Nutrition,
for physical health implications.
See the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR), General Comment 14: the right to the highest attainable standard of
health, 11 Aug 2000 UN Doc E/C.12/2000/4, CESCR, which elaborates
the provisions of article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic,
Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) (1966).
Article 6(2), Convention.
Article 24(1), Convention.
Article 39, Convention.
Rule 51, United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived
of their Liberty (1990). See too Principle 4(1), United Nations
Principles for the protection of persons with mental illness and the improvement
of mental health care (1991).
Rule 50, United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived
of their Liberty. Each institution should have at least "one
qualified medical officer who should have some knowledge of psychiatry.
The medical services should be organized in close relationship to the
general health administration of the community or nation. They shall include
a psychiatric service for the diagnosis and, in proper cases, the treatment
of states of mental abnormality." Rule 22(1), Standard Minimum
Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (1955).
Rule 49, United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived
of their Liberty. This is in order "to prevent stigmatization
of the juvenile and promote self-respect and integration into the community".
The provision of appropriate medical professionals is in addition to "the
provision of a sufficient number of hospitals, clinics and other health-related
facilities, and the promotion and support of the establishment of institutions
providing counselling and mental health services, with due regard to equitable
distribution throughout the country"; CESCR, General Comment 14,
para 36.
Rule 53, United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived
of their Liberty. See Principle 9(1), United Nations Principles
for the protection of persons with mental illness and the improvement
of mental health care, which provides that treatment should occur
"in the least restrictive environment and with the least restrictive
or intrusive treatment appropriate to the patient's health needs and the
need to protect the physical safety of others". See also Rule 22(2), UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners.
See articles 3(2), 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 18 and 22, Convention (right to parents),
article 14 (freedom of religion under guidance of parents), article 16
(prevents arbitrary or unlawful interference with the child's family),
article 20 (where a child is deprived of a family environment, there should
be cultural continuity in their upbringing), article 21 (repeats this
for inter-country adoption), article 29 (respect for culture in the aims
of education) and articles 10 and 22 (require positive measures for child
asylum seekers).
See Background Paper 2: Culture and Identity;
also UNHCR (1994), Refugee Children: Guidelines on Protection and Care,
Geneva (UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care), ch 3.
UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care, ch4.
See Background Paper 1: Introduction.
UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care, ch4. This transition is the focus
of developmental psychology of children. See C Peterson (1996), Looking
forward through the lifespan: Developmental Psychology, Prentice Hall,
p18.
This includes interacting with the stress or coping capacity of their
parents, see Peterson, Looking forward through the lifespan, p
25. See McCallin, The Psychological Well Being of Refugee Children,
pp 84-86.
J Garbarino, Developmental Consequences of Living in Dangerous and
Unstable Environments: the Situation of Refugee Children, in McCallin, The Psychological Well Being of Refugee Children, p1.
McCallin, The Psychological Well Being of Refugee Children, p71.
Article 19, Convention.
Article 39, Convention.
The UN Body that oversees implementation of the Convention. See Background
Paper 1: Introduction.
Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Guidelines Regarding
the Form and Contents of Periodic Reports to be Submitted by States Parties
under Article 44, paragraph 1(b) of the Convention, 11 October 1996,
Part V111B(2): 20/11/96. UN Doc CRC/C/58; at para 90. See also paras 91,
129-131.
McCallin, The Psychological Well Being of Refugee Children, p84;
A Mahjoub, The Theory of Stress as an Approach to Studying Psychological
Responses in a War Environment, cited in McCallin, The Psychological
Well Being of Refugee Children, pp36-37.
The International Children's Institute (2000), Introduction to Literature
Review: Psychosocial Programming for Children in Refugee Camps, Montreal,
Canada.
Introduced in 1999 and revised in 2001, temporary protection visas have
a number of restrictions, most notably the inability to seek permanent
residency status. See Background Paper 7: Legal
Status. See too DIMIA Fact Sheet 64.
This includes the right to be detained only as a last resort and for the
shortest appropriate period of time (article 37(b)). See Background
Paper 8: Deprivation of Liberty and Humane Detention.
See UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care. UNHCR promotes the concept
of "durable" (medium and long-term) solutions for children and
their families in all planning and programming regarding child refugees
and asylum seekers.
Such as transfer of documentation, reunion with family members in the
home country; see Background Paper 6: Legal Status.
UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care, ch4. See also UNHCR Guidelines
on Protection and Care, ch8:
"Considering
the effects that a prolonged stay in camp or camp-like situations may
have on children's physical and psychological developments, the refugee
status determination or decision-making on the child's best interests
must be made quickly, and with the appropriate special attention and procedures.
Keeping children in limbo regarding their status, hence their security
and their future, can be harmful to them". See discussion in Background
Papers 7: Legal Status and Background Paper 8: Deprivation of Liberty
and Humane Detention.
UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care, ch4. UNHCR describes the effects
on adolescents as ranging "from depression, apathy, delinquent behaviour
or aggressive acts to situational mental disturbances, drug abuse and
suicide" which may reflect the high level of anxiety and despair
with the refugee community as a whole".
Article 34 provides: "States Parties undertake to protect the child
from all forms of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. For these purposes,
States Parties shall in particular take all appropriate national, bilateral
and multilateral measures to prevent:
(a) The inducement or coercion of a child to engage in any unlawful sexual
activity;
(b) The exploitative use of children in prostitution or other unlawful
sexual practices;
(c) The exploitative use of children in pornographic performances and
materials."
See Rule 8, Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners;
Rule 29, United Nations Rules for the Protection of Juveniles Deprived
of their Liberty; Guideline 8, UNHCR, Guidelines on applicable
Criteria and Standards relating to the Detention of Asylum-Seekers (1999)
(UNHCR Guidelines on Detention); Rule 26.3, Standard Minimum Rules
for the Administration of Juvenile Justice (1985) and article 37(c),
Convention. See reference to Australia's reservation to article 37(c)
in Background Paper 8: Deprivation of Liberty
and Humane Detention.
Australia made a reservation to article 37(c), Convention, in relation
to the separation of children from adults in prisons on ratification in
December 1990. Arguably the intention of the reservation did not extend
to children in immigration detention. Whether the reservation does extend
to children in immigration detention will be considered by the Inquiry.
The reservation stated:
"Australia accepts
the general principles of article 37. In relation to the second sentence
of paragraph (c), the obligation to separate children from adults in prison
is accepted only to the extent that such imprisonment is considered by
the responsible authorities to be feasible and consistent with the obligation
that children be able to maintain contact with their families, having
regard to the geography and demography of Australia. Australia, therefore,
ratifies the Convention to the extent that it is unable to comply with
the obligation imposed by article 37 (c)."
UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care, ch4.
UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care, ch4.
Article 9(1) provides: "States Parties shall ensure that a child
shall not be separated from his or her parents against their will, except
when competent authorities subject to judicial review determine, in accordance
with applicable law and procedures, that such separation is necessary
for the best interests of the child. Such determination may be necessary
in a particular case such as one involving abuse or neglect of the child
by the parents, or one where the parents are living separately and a decision
must be made as to the child's place of residence." See also Australia's
obligation to protect against child abuse in article 19 (discussed above)
and article 34 (below).
UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care, ch4.
See articles 5, 9(1) and 18, Convention.
Including resolution of the family's refugee claim, see Background
Paper 7: Legal Status.
See UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care, ch4.
Articles 12 and 5, Convention. Where the child is not capable of forming
his or her own views, the child's parents should be involved in the decision-making
process.
Article 39, Convention.
Principle 9, United Nations Principles for the protection of persons
with mental illness and the improvement of mental health care provides
that "the treatment and care of every patient shall be based on an
individually prescribed plan "
Article 19(2), Convention.
A Mahjoub, The Theory of Stress as an Approach to Studying Psychological
Responses in a War Environment, cited in McCallin, The Psychological
Well Being of Refugee Children, p38. See too General Comment 14 of the Committee On Economic, Social And Cultural Rights on the need to
"ensur[e] access to child-friendly information about preventive and
health-promoting behaviour and support to families and communities in
implementing these practices." at para 22.
A Mahjoub, The Theory of Stress as an Approach to Studying Psychological
Responses in a War Environment, cited in McCallin, The Psychological
Well Being of Refugee Children, pp36-37.
"Children seeking asylum should not be kept in detention. This is
particularly important in the case of unaccompanied children", UNHCR
(1997) Guidelines on Policies and Procedures in dealing with Unaccompanied
Children Seeking Asylum (UNHCR Guidelines on Unaccompanied Children),
Geneva, para 7.6.
UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care, ch 10; UNHCR Guidelines on Unaccompanied
Children, para 5.17; UNHCR/Save the Children (2000) "Statement of
Good Practice" of the Separated Children in Europe Programme, para
3.
Article 20
of the Convention provides:
"1. A child temporarily or permanently deprived of his or her family
environment, or in whose own best interests cannot be allowed to remain
in that environment, shall be entitled to special protection and assistance
provided by the State.
2. States Parties shall in accordance with their national laws ensure
alternative care for such a child.
3. Such care could include, inter alia, foster placement, kafalah of Islamic
law, adoption or if necessary placement in suitable institutions for the
care of children. When considering solutions, due regard shall be paid
to the desirability of continuity in a child's upbringing and to the child's
ethnic, religious, cultural and linguistic background." See also
articles 22(2), 7(1), 10(1), 10(3) and 9(3), Convention.
The UNHCR/Save the Children "Statement of Good Practice" of
the Separated Children in Europe Programme has a detailed description
of the functions of a guardian or adviser at paras 4 and 10. See also
articles 18(2), 19, 20, Convention; UNHCR Guidelines on Unaccompanied
Children, para 5.7.
UNHCR Guidelines on Unaccompanied Children, para 8.3.
See A Mahjoub, The Theory of Stress as an Approach to Studying Psychological
Responses in a War Environment, cited in McCallin, The Psychological
Well Being of Refugee Children, p24.
A Mahjoub, The Theory of Stress as an Approach to Studying Psychological
Responses in a War Environment, cited in McCallin, The Psychological
Well Being of Refugee Children, p27.
A Mahjoub citing Selye, in The Theory of Stress as an Approach to Studying
Psychological Responses in a War Environment, cited in McCallin, The
Psychological Well Being of Refugee Children, pp30-31.
J Garbarino, Developmental Consequences of Living in Dangerous and
Unstable Environments: The Situation of Refugee Children, in McCallin, The Psychological Well Being of Refugee Children, pp6-9.
DS Masser (1992), "Psychological functioning of American refugee
children" in Child Welfare, 71, pp439-456; MB Melville & MB Lykes
(1992), "Guatemalan Indian children and the sociocultural effects
of government sponsored terrorism", Social Science and Medicine,
34, pp533-548; EM Ressler, N Boothby, and D Steinbock, (1998),Unaccompanied
children: care and protection in wars, natural disasters and refugee movements,
Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK; MM Tsoi, GK Yu and F Lieh-Mak, (1986),
"Vietnamese refugee children in camps in Hong Kong", Social
Science and Medicine, 23, pp1147-1150; all cited in A Sourander (1998), Behaviour Problems and Traumatic Events of Unaccompanied Refugee Minors,
Child Abuse and Neglect, 22(7) pp719-727.
D Silove and Z Steel (1998), The Mental Health and Well-Being of On-Shore
Asylum Seekers in Australia, Psychiatry Research and Teaching Unit,
University of New South Wales.
D Silove and Z Steel (2000) "The Psychological Cost of Seeking and
Granting Asylum", in AH Shalev, R Yehuda and AC McFarlane (eds) International
Handbook of Human Response to Trauma. Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers,
New York, p435.
D Silove, P McIntosh and R Becker (1993), "Risk of retraumatisation
of asylum-seekers" in Australia in Australian and New Zealand
Journal of Psychiatry, 27, pp606-612 at p607.
Silove et al, "Risk of retraumatisation of asylum-seekers",
p607.
D Silove, I Sinnerbrink, A Field, V Manicavasagar and Z Steel (1997),
"Anxiety, depression and PTSD in asylum seekers: Associations with
pre-migration trauma and post-migration stressors", British Journal
of Psychiatry, 170, pp351-357.
Namely DSM-IV. See, for example, http://www.mental-health-today.com/ptsd/dsm.htm
A Sultan & K O'Sullivan (2001) "Psychological disturbances in
asylum seekers held in long term detention: a participant-observer account" Medical Journal of Australia, 175, pp593-596.
Silove et al, "Anxiety, depression and PTSD in asylum seekers",
pp351-357.
Silove et al, "The Psychological Cost of Seeking and Granting Asylum".
68 The Maribyrnong Detention Centre Tamil Survey, cited in D Silove
and Z Steel (1998), The Mental Health and Well-Being of On-Shore Asylum
Seekers in Australia.
Article 24, Convention.
Articles 28 and 29, Convention.
UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care, ch4.
The aims of education are outlined in article 29, Convention and expanded
in the Committee on the Right of the Child's General Comment 1,
which provides that the aims of education are:
"the holistic development of the full potential of the child (29(1)(a)),
including development of respect for human rights (29(1)(b)), an enhanced
sense of identity and affiliation (29(1)(c)), and his or her socialization
and interaction with others (29(1)(d)) and with the environment (29(1)(e)).",
UN Doc CRC/GC/2001/1, CRC General Comment 1, 17 April 2001.
UNICEF (1998), Implementation Handbook for the Convention on the Rights
of the Child (UNICEF Implementation Handbook), United Nations Children's
Fund, New York, p419; UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care, ch4.
UNICEF Implementation Handbook, p419
Article 2(1) International Labour Organisation Convention No.79.
It should be noted that Australia has not ratified the Convention. See
UNICEF Implementation Handbook, p419.
UNICEF Implementation Handbook, p420.
See the Declaration of the Child's Right to Play (1959), adopted
by the International Association for the Child's Right to Play, cited
in UNICEF Implementation Handbook, pp420-421.
UNICEF Implementation Handbook, pp417, 420.
UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care, ch4.
UNHCR Guidelines on Protection and Care, ch4.
UNICEF Implementation Handbook, pp421-422. See also Background
Paper 2: Culture and Identity.
See the Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Guidelines Regarding
the Form and Contents of Periodic Reports to be Submitted by States Parties,
11 October 1996, Part V111B(2), . 20/11/96. CRC/C/58, where the Committee
requests States Parties to "Please indicate the measures undertaken,
including of a legislative, administrative and judicial nature, to recognize
the right of the child who has been placed by the competent authorities
for the purposes of care, protection or treatment of his or her physical
and mental health, to a periodic review of the treatment provided to the
child in public and private institutions, services and facilities, as
well as all other circumstances relevant to his or her placement";
at para 86. The detail of information sought is outlined in para 87.
See Background Papers 7 and 8 on Legal status and Deprivation of Liberty and Humane Detention respectively. Article 3(3), Convention provides: "States Parties
shall ensure that the institutions, services and facilities responsible
for the care or protection of children shall conform with the standards
established by competent authorities, particularly in the areas of safety,
health, in the number and suitability of their staff, as well as competent
supervision".
UNICEF Implementation Handbook, p341.
Article 3(3), Convention.